HEFT Repository

Conservative care for ESRD in the United Kingdom: a national survey.

Okamoto, Ikumi and Tonkin-Crine, Sarah and Rayner, Hugh and Murtagh, Fliss E M and Farrington, Ken and Caskey, Fergus and Tomson, Charles and Loud, Fiona and Greenwood, Roger and O'Donoghue, Donal J and Roderick, Paul (2015) Conservative care for ESRD in the United Kingdom: a national survey. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 10 (1). pp. 120-6. ISSN 1555-905X.

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://cjasn.asnjournals.org/content/10/1/120.shor...

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Conservative kidney management (CKM) has been developed in the United Kingdom (UK) as an alternative to dialysis for older patients with stage 5 CKD (CKD5) and multiple comorbidities. This national survey sought to describe the current scale and pattern of delivery of conservative care in UK renal units and identify their priorities for its future development.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

A survey on practice patterns of CKM for patients age 75 and older with CKD5 was sent to clinical directors of all 71 adult renal units in the UK in March 2013.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven units (94%) responded. All but one unit reported providing CKM for some patients. Terminology varied, although "conservative management" was the most frequently used term (46%). Lack of an agreed-upon definition of when a patient is receiving CKM made it difficult to obtain meaningful data on the numbers of such patients. Fifty-two percent provided the number of CKM patients age ≥ 75 years in 2012; the median was 45 per unit (interquartile range [IQR], 20-83). The median number of symptomatic CKM patients who would otherwise have started dialysis was eight (IQR, 4.5-22). CKM practice patterns varied: 35% had a written guideline, 23% had dedicated CKM clinics, 45% had dedicated staff, and 50% provided staff training on CKM. Most units (88%) provided primary care clinicians with information/advice regarding CKM. Eighty percent identified a need for better evidence comparing outcomes on CKM versus dialysis, and 65% considered it appropriate to enter patients into a randomized trial.

CONCLUSIONS

CKM is provided in almost all UK renal units, but scale and organization vary widely. Lack of common terminology and definitions hinders the development and assessment of CKM. Many survey respondents expressed support for further research comparing outcomes with conservative care versus dialysis.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: WJ Urogenital system. Urology
Divisions: Emergency Services > Renal
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Miss Adele Stanton
Date Deposited: 31 May 2015 06:27
Last Modified: 31 May 2015 06:27
URI: http://www.repository.heartofengland.nhs.uk/id/eprint/906

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item