HEFT Repository

Bypass versus angio plasty in severe ischaemia of the leg - 2 (BASIL-2) trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Popplewell, Matthew A and Davies, Huw and Jarrett, Hugh and Bate, Gareth and Grant, Margaret and Patel, Smitaa and Mehta, Samir and Andronis, Lazaros and Roberts, Tracy and Deeks, Jon and Bradbury, Andrew W (2016) Bypass versus angio plasty in severe ischaemia of the leg - 2 (BASIL-2) trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials, 17. p. 11. ISSN 1745-6215.

[img]
Preview
Text (PDF file)
Bypass versus angio plasty in severe ischaemia of the leg 2 BASIL 2 trial study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
Official URL: http://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10...

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Severe limb ischaemia is defined by ischaemic rest/night pain, tissue loss, or both, secondary to arterial insufficiency and is increasingly caused by infra-popliteal (below the knee) disease, mainly as a result of the increasing worldwide prevalence of diabetes. Currently, it is unknown whether vein bypass surgery or the best endovascular treatment (angioplasty or stenting) represents the optimal revascularisation strategy in terms of amputation-free survival, overall survival, relief of symptoms, quality of life and cost-effective use of health care resources.

METHODS/DESIGN

The Bypass vs. Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg - 2 Trial is a UK National Institute of Health Research, Health Technology Assessment funded, multi-centre randomised controlled trial that compares, at the point of clinical equipoise, the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a 'vein bypass first' and a 'best endovascular treatment first' revascularisation strategy for severe limb ischaemia due to infra-popliteal disease. The primary clinical outcome is amputation-free survival defined as the time to major (above the ankle) amputation of the trial limb or death from any cause. The primary outcome for the cost-effectiveness analysis is cost per quality-adjusted life year. Secondary outcomes include overall survival, quality of life, in-hospital mortality and morbidity, repeat and crossover interventions, healing of tissue loss and haemodynamic changes following revascularisation. Sample size is estimated at 600 patients. An economic evaluation will be conducted from the perspective of the National Health Service and comprise a 'within-study' analysis, based on prospectively collected trial data and a 'model-based' analysis, which will extrapolate and compare costs and effects beyond the study follow-up period.

DISCUSSION

The BASIL-2 trial is designed to be pragmatic and represent current practice within the United Kingdom. Patients with severe limb ischaemia can only be randomised into the trial where clinical equipose exists. The advent of hybrid operating procedures should not be a barrier to randomisation, should a patient require inflow correction prior to tibial revascularisation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN

27728689 Date of registration: 12 May 2014.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: WO Surgery
Divisions: Planned IP Care > Vascular
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Miss Adele Creak
Date Deposited: 03 Mar 2017 14:46
Last Modified: 03 Mar 2017 14:46
URI: http://www.repository.heartofengland.nhs.uk/id/eprint/1238

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item