HEFT Repository

Systematic review of interventions to improve appropriate use and outcomes associated with do-not-attempt-cardiopulmonary-resuscitation decisions.

Field, Richard A and Fritz, Zoë and Baker, Annalie and Grove, Amy and Perkins, Gavin D (2014) Systematic review of interventions to improve appropriate use and outcomes associated with do-not-attempt-cardiopulmonary-resuscitation decisions. Resuscitation, 85 (11). pp. 1418-31. ISSN 1873-1570. This article is accessible to all HEFT staff and students via NHS Evidence www.evidence.nhs.uk by using their HEFT Athens login IDs

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://www.resuscitationjournal.com/article/S0300-...

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The treatment for a cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), may be lifesaving following an acute, potentially reversible illness. Yet this treatment is unlikely to be effective if cardiac arrest occurs as part of the dying process towards the end of a person's natural life. Do not attempt CPR (DNACPR) decisions allow resuscitation to be withheld when it has little chance of success, or where the patient, or those close to the patient, indicate the burdens of CPR outweigh the benefits. This review sought to identify evidence for systems that improve the appropriate use of DNACPR decisions.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched (Medline, CINAHL and Embase) for English language articles from 2001 to 2014.

RESULTS

4090 citations were identified of which 37 studies were relevant. The overall quality of evidence was moderate to poor. Thematic synthesis identified key interventions which may improve DNACPR decision making. The most promising interventions involved structured discussion at the time of acute admission to hospital and review by specialist teams at the point of an acute deterioration. Linking DNACPR decisions to discussions about overall treatment plans provided greater clarity about goals of care, aided communication between clinicians and reduced harms. Standardised documentation proved helpful for improving the frequency and quality of recording DNACPR decisions. Patient and clinician education in isolation were associated with limited or no effects.

CONCLUSION

Relatively simple process changes may enhance the appropriate use of and outcomes associated with DNACPR decisions. Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO2012:CRD42012002669.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This article is accessible to all HEFT staff and students via NHS Evidence www.evidence.nhs.uk by using their HEFT Athens login IDs
Subjects: WB Practice of medicine > WB400 Intensive care
Divisions: Clinical Support > Critical Care
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Mrs Caroline Tranter
Date Deposited: 06 Jul 2015 13:45
Last Modified: 06 Jul 2015 13:45
URI: http://www.repository.heartofengland.nhs.uk/id/eprint/1012

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item